Insights

De‑escalation or Gridlock: Private infrastructure portfolios under two Iran‑Conflict paths

23 April 2026 Outlook

(5-minute read)

Renewed conflict in the Middle East has triggered a material energy supply‑side disruption. Looking beyond the immediate shock, however, recent developments closely reflect the longer‑term structural geopolitical shifts we have previously highlighted, as energy, trade and security become ever more tightly linked.

In our latest insight below, we explore the impact on infrastructure to date and outline two scenarios ahead, along with the respective portfolio considerations for investors. To download our insight, please click the button on the right.


 

Where are we today

A Major Energy Shock: In recent weeks, renewed conflict in the Middle East has triggered a material energy supply‑side shock, pushing international oil and gas prices higher. A ceasefire between the US and Iran has paused the conflict but the economic damage is already meaningful and will emerge over the coming months. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and damage to gas production facilities have meaningfully curtailed approximately 20% of global oil and gas reserves.

Part of a Broader Structural Shift: Viewed beyond the immediate shock, recent developments align closely with the longer‑term structural geopolitical shift that we have previously highlighted , as energy, trade and security become more tightly linked. The global economy is becoming increasingly polarised, energy dependence has re‑emerged as a key vulnerability, with countries and regions diverging more sharply based on energy security and technological capability. This is reinforcing the potential for uneven outcomes across geographies and sectors.

Macro & Market Impact: Higher oil and gas prices have lifted headline inflation and eroded near term growth momentum, particularly in energy importing regions. Europe and parts of Asia are more exposed through higher energy costs and weaker confidence, while North America has so far appeared comparatively resilient given its domestic energy base. Central banks have responded by pushing out expectations for rate cuts, reinforcing a “higher for longer” bias, while long term bond yields, equity and credit markets have experienced volatility.

Infrastructure Performance: Within listed infrastructure, sector performance since the escalation has been uneven, reflecting differences in exposure to energy prices, regulation and demand sensitivity. Energy equities have shown sharp divergence: refiners, North American shale producers and LNG‑linked companies have rallied on tighter global supply and higher global gas prices. Markets have initially rotated defensively seeking regulated and contracted exposure. Utilities have generally outperformed broader equity markets, benefiting from their defensive characteristics and inflation pass‑through, though the picture is regionally mixed.

North American utilities have shown resilience, while some European utilities are exposed to gas input costs due to reliance on gas‑fired generation. Transport assets have experienced short‑lived relief rallies, notably among airlines following ceasefire headlines, but longer‑term uncertainty persists. Logistics bottlenecks, elevated fuel costs and insurance premia may weigh particularly on the shipping and tanker segments.

For private infrastructure, the impact of the initial shock is more muted than in public markets, and more focused on fundamentals, with long‑dated contracts, regulated cash flows and appraisal‑based valuations providing a degree of insulation from short‑term volatility.

The effects on private infrastructure will unfold over time through inflation pass‑through, financing conditions, demand dynamics and discount rates effects, if the conflict persist and inflation remains elevated.

Diverging Scenarios Ahead

After a likely initial phase in the first half of 2026 characterised by higher energy prices, inflation and weaker global growth, outcomes for private infrastructure hinge on two scenarios that that will likely begin to unfold in the second half of 2026: one in which a ceasefire holds, and the shock gradually dissipates, and another in which conflict becomes protracted, prolonging uncertainty, volatility and supply chain disruptions. These scenarios carry materially different implications for macroeconomic conditions, infrastructure subsectors and portfolio positioning. We briefly assess below how infrastructure assets may respond across these two divergent paths.

Scenario Analysis: Macro and Infrastructure (12 to 18 months from Q1 2026)

Source: InfraRed Capital Partners, April 2026. There is no guarantee that the forecast highlighted will materialize.

 

Positioning Infrastructure Portfolios Across Scenarios: When viewed through a medium‑ to long‑term portfolio construction lens, well‑diversified private infrastructure portfolios are expected to continue to demonstrate resilience. Across both scenarios, optimisation over a long‑term investment horizon suggests portfolios should tilt only modestly across strategies rather than reallocate in a binary manner, reflecting primarily the net impact of shifts in real rates.

The relative emphasis between strategies across scenarios is driven by whether investors seek to prioritise downside protection against persistent stagflation via core assets, assuming a prolonged conflict scenario, or if they also want to focus on recovery‑led upside through incremental core-plus and value‑add exposure.

Under a prolonged conflict scenario, more elevated inflation and widening risk premia are expected to favour a more defensive tilt toward Core infrastructure, underpinned by inflation linkage and the resilience of long‑term contracted cash flows. In a prolonged ceasefire scenario, characterised by moderating inflation, compressing long‑end yields and a resumption of growth, portfolio adjustment supports a measured and balanced rotation, and the focus gradually moves from inflation‑linked stability toward capital growth. Overall, while dynamic allocation remains important as real rates, risk premia and exit visibility evolve, Core, Core Plus and Value‑Add strategies continue to play complementary and foundational roles within a well‑diversified infrastructure portfolio.5

Source: InfraRed Capital Partners, April 2026. For illustrative purposes only. There is no guarantee that the forecast highlighted will materialize

 

Megatrends At A Crossroad: A prolonged conflict may accelerate the direction of infrastructure megatrends but will also likely lead to greater regional divergence, particularly when it comes to energy transition and digitalisation.

The North American market stands out due to its expected level of resilience, underpinned by energy security and deeper capital markets. Europe and parts of Asia face a more challenging outlook due to higher energy dependence and tighter financing conditions. Electrification, biofuels and transport decarbonisation are likely to gain further momentum as energy security moves to the forefront of policy priorities. Governments are expected to place greater emphasis on oil and gas supply‑chain resilience, particularly storage and strategic reserves, with several countries seeking to expand national reserve coverage from limited levels toward materially higher benchmarks. Digital infrastructure is expected to remain structurally attractive; however, persistently higher power costs may increasingly shape geographic deployment, favouring markets with access to cheaper and more reliable energy, notably the United States.

Finally, it’s worth remembering that against this backdrop, infrastructure remains well positioned to generate durable, long‑term value for investors who are able to navigate regional divergences and align capital with the structural forces reshaping energy systems and digital demand.

Authored by:

Gianluca Minella,

Head of Research

 

References

Macrobond, April 2026

2 InfraRed Capital Partners, Geopolitics and Infrastructure Investment, February 2026

3 Macrobond, April 2026

4 Macrobond, April 2026

5 Allocations are derived from portfolio optimisation outputs and reflect relative shifts in risk preference rather than absolute return forecasts.

InfraRed has based this document on information obtained from sources it believes to be reliable, but which have not been independently verified. All charts and graphs are from publicly available sources or proprietary data. Except in the case of fraudulent misrepresentation, InfraRed makes no representation or warranty (express or implied) of any nature or accepts any responsibility or liability of any kind for the accuracy or sufficiency of any information, statement, assumption or projection in this document, or for any loss or damage (whether direct, indirect, consequential or other) arising out of reliance upon this document.  InfraRed is under no obligation to keep current the information contained in this document.

You are solely responsible for making your own independent appraisal of and investigations into the products, investments and transactions referred to in this document and you should not rely on any information in this document as constituting investment advice. This document is not intended to provide and should not be relied upon for tax, legal or accounting advice, investment recommendations or other evaluation. Prospective investors should consult their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors. Prospective investors should not rely upon this document in making any investment decision.

Investments can fluctuate in value, and value and income may fall against an investor’s interests. The levels and bases of taxation can change. Changes in rates of exchange and rates of interest may have an adverse effect on the value or income of the investment or any potential returns. Figures included in this document may relate to past performance. Past performance refers to the past is not a reliable indicator of future results. There can be no assurance that the opportunity will achieve its target returns or that investors will receive a return from their capital. Investment in the products or investments referred to in this document entails a high degree of risk and is suitable only for sophisticated investors who fully understand and are capable of bearing the risks of such an investment, including the risk of total loss of capital originally invested.  It may also be difficult to obtain reliable information about the value of these investments, which will often have an inherent lack of liquidity and will not be readily realisable.

This document is being issued for the purposes of providing general information about InfraRed’s services and/or specific assets and their operational performance only and does not relate to the marketing of investments in any alternative investment fund managed by InfraRed.

InfraRed may offer co-investment opportunities to limited partners, or third parties. These circumstances represent conflicts of interests. InfraRed have internal arrangements designed to identify and to manage potential conflicts of interest.

This document should be distributed and read in its entirety. This document remains the property of InfraRed and on request must be returned and any copies destroyed. Distribution of this document or information in this document, to any person other than an original recipient (or to such recipient’s advisors) is prohibited. Reproduction of this document, in whole or in part, or disclosure of any of its contents, without prior consent of InfraRed or an associate, is prohibited.

This document is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. 

InfraRed Capital Partners is a part of SLC Management which is the institutional alternatives and traditional asset management business of Sun Life.

Further reading